October 22, 2014 § Leave a comment
They were discussing how many trophies they had earned in the new Super Smash Bros. game for the 3DS. Four hundred and eight, one said. Another chimed in with the rather robust number of six hundred and nineteen. Not sure how many I have over here…I don’t really remember where to go to find out, but I know it’s probably in the double digits. It’s not like these people have had it longer than me, I got it the first day it came out.
I really haven’t looked at my trophy count in the game and it seems like I go days at a time without playing. Don’t get me wrong, the game is perfect other than being on a very hard to hold and control system. I love it, really.
But I just don’t play games like I used to. I don’t feel like sitting down with the game for hours on end and even when I do it’s because there’s a story there and I have gotten really invested in it. My play through of Bioshock: Infinite kind of brought that out in me as did Last of Us. But these games are different than the kind of thing where you’re just in direct competition or you’re just running around on senseless missions.
I don’t think I’ve self identified as a gamer in years. I play games, sure. But I don’t really hang onto the whole medium the way others that I know do. When we started to see what is largely seen as gamer subculture arise with it’s own clothing, music and food I stayed away from that stuff. I’ve never been that enamored with Mountain Dew and besides mc chris nerdcore kind of wore on me. I just…never wanted to be seen as that person because I didn’t really identify with the other people that I saw in that group. Hell, I’ve never been one to identify with most groups.
And if you’re in the group that’s okay. I feel like at one point I was in there too…it’s just that I don’t fit anymore and what all of this means has changed.
October 21, 2014 § Leave a comment
Gamer Gate is the kind of thing I would usually talk about, but frankly I find the whole thing bizarre in that it’s taken on this kind of life where some people are so sure that it’s all about integrity in game journalism. At the same time there is an overwhelmingly vocal portion of the supporters of the movement that are very, very sexist and misogynistic.
The movement is basically the equivalent of a group of people on a rooftop masturbating so that the sound carries through megaphones down to a crowd of horrified onlookers. Meanwhile a second, possibly larger, group who is self-blindfolded tries to convince the crowd that they’re not masturbating and that’s the important thing all while ignoring the fact someone is beating off and that the beating off is exactly what triggered everyone looking to see who was doing all the beating off in the first place.
As someone who was raised on video games and came up in the late 1980s I feel like I have a need to comment, if not an obligation. Video games have changed tremendously in my life time and they have gone from indiscernible groupings of pixels that vaguely represent the idea of something to near-life-like representations of characters we love and care about that have personality, complex backstories and histories to rival that of other fictional characters and even some real ones.
Do I think gaming is important? Well, yeah it’s as important as any of the other things that people do for pleasure. It’s a different form of entertainment, one that you experience in a way that you don’t get through reading or television and movies.
But I think part of what’s causing gaming not to grow is stuff like what’s happening in this whole Gamer Gate scandal. I mean what’s really happening. We have a group of people being non-inclusive. They want women harassed for speaking up or having opinions, they want women threatened with rape and other horrible stuff and then they turn around and wonder why their artistic medium isn’t taken seriously.
Really, I feel like the whole subject is tiring and the fact that it’s been given this much attention by the community says something really bad about gamers over all. Do you think journalistic integrity is that great anywhere? Especially when it comes to reviews. Read any number of reviews for an iPhone and compare them with Android phones with the exact same features. The connotation of the words changes and what’s a negative for one phone isn’t mentioned for the other. People who review technology like phones are often given free phones to try out before the public gets them. They can keep the phone. People were whining about the same thing in game journalism as if they want these people who barely make enough money to live already should go completely into debt by buying a shit ton of games just to tell a horde of ungrateful assholes if they’re good or not. Movie reviewers also get free tickets or screener copies of movies.
My point is that the things that the game community are so upset about are normal. People are upset that reviewers are getting to know developers. Of course they are. They got into this business because they love games and some of these people they get to meet are their heroes. You don’t think that these people are going to date each other or that they’re going to be friends or hang out? Do you think that no one who covers real news has ever made friends with a politician that they had to cover (because you would be wrong. Jon Stewart was friends with Anthony Weiner and covered what happened with his political career like he would have anyone else. Connections don’t make people suddenly lose integrity in all cases).
This is why I find it so hard to side with either side of the Gamer Gate cause spectrum, at best it’s people who are upset about something that is happening across the board with media and at worse it’s people upset that women dare to speak. One of those things I feel like would be better served if people focused their attention on the problem with media at large and the other I feel like is a fundamental problem with the culture of the average gamer and gaming at large.
This video pretty much sums up my entire thought process on this thing. This comment from the video comment section is a favorite of mine:
“The comment section today seems pretty anti-feminist in defense of GamerGate. That this video is somehow feminist because he’d like women not to be harassed? And yet people claim GamerGate isn’t anti-feminist, even though the video is being described as feminist as something bad. that says a lot.”—Mia Mulder (Not related to Fox Mulder)
One more thing: stop using the term social justice warriors like it’s some kind of awful racial slur. I don’t get when it became bad to stand up for gays, women, and other races. But hint, it’s not.
October 17, 2014 § Leave a comment
It’s been a busy few days for me. I haven’t been feeling super well and my mood has been crap to say the least. But I’m coping and I’ve learned to do this without having to bring others around me down.
This isn’t to do with the Doctor Who episode from last Saturday. That was fantastic. That might be setting season eight up to be one of the best seasons of New-Who. The mummy angle was brilliant and offered a real mystery, but the drama with the Doctor and Clara was the real meat and potatoes of the episode. I think her reaction is the first time in the new show we’ve seen someone really react realistically to the Doctor changing. Before we had Rose who really only cared for a single episode and when we were introduced to Eleven he was meeting a new companion and Amy didn’t have a reason to react.
A man you’ve just been traveling with for months has suddenly turned into an entirely different person with different moods and a changed temperament. Clara isn’t handling that well and nor should she be expected to, but we’re getting to see that the Doctor cares about her underneath it all and that really is what she needed to know. This seems like an honest mistake (I mean the tickets were free. Free!).
I don’t really have much to say about this episode and my head is cluttered right now. But it was solid and I think this bodes well for this season and this Doctor. Capaldi is shaping up to be my second favorite and he’s bringing fans back to the show.
I suspect that some of the people who didn’t like the show with Matt Smith really just didn’t like Smith, which I don’t get. Then again I have a less than favorable opinion of Tennant, so to each their own I guess.
October 10, 2014 § Leave a comment
Going to try to keep this short. I know I say that a lot, but I rarely do it. I picked up the fresh off the presses Batgril #35, the issue that I blogged about being the big change over in the tone of the series, and let me just say did they keep that promise.
The art is more light hearted and brighter and Batgirl is moved out of the dreary downtown section of Gotham to live in trendy, upbeat Burnside. the transition might be jarring. The new team goes fast like their ripping off a band-aid, but I think it’s time to stop pandering to comic book readers as if there’s only one type of reader reading these things.
Yes, there’s a girly tone to the book now. But it’s odd to see that leveled as criticism when roughly half of the planet is girls and some of those girls will more than likely like girly stuff. And some of the guys won’t mind something in that tone if it’s well written (and drawn).
I’m not sure how far in advance these things are written, but the story seems ripped from the headlines of the iCloud hacking scandal. Someone in Gotham is stealing phones and collecting the data on them to expose the secret lives of others. That’s the villain for this book. I liked it and it didn’t have that depressing tone so many other comics seem to need to have (what’s with DC and not wanting people to have fun?).
Also the art is nice. Babs Tarr has a real stand out style.
If you’re worn thin on brooding superheroes I would give this one a try.
October 7, 2014 § Leave a comment
I’ve been seeing this thing around the internet for the last few days about the end of the era of cartoons on Saturday morning. My only reaction was “meh”. In a world where you can turn on one of half a dozen cable channels geared specifically towards kids, a few channels showing stuff early on one morning doesn’t mean as much.
The best cartoons have been on cable for almost a decade now and a few networks limped along fighting because they saw a reason to. But it doesn’t really change my life or my world around me. It won’t change anything going on around most of us, so why are people so mopey and sad in the comments?
It feels like there’s not really genuine emotion anymore coming from people. At least not when it’s appropriate. These people who sit there talking about how greatly the cartoons they’re not watching Saturday mornings will be missed are the same people who will scoff at the victims of Ebola, turn a blind eye to the victims of atrocities overseas and here and the same people that don’t generally give a shit about upcoming elections or even know that there is one.
“How can I tell that these people don’t watch cartoons in that time slot” you might be asking. Because if all the people complaining about this great loss did watch them, then they wouldn’t be going off. People are so ready to be distraught over nostalgia and want to hold anything old in high esteem. Yes, most of us liked cartoons growing up. But get over it. Times change, things go away and die and we move on. This isn’t a big deal, it won’t affect 90% of you (or more). People need to stop pausing to cry over these things and make a big deal out of them because it obviously wasn’t a big enough deal for you to care before.
October 7, 2014 § 2 Comments
This has been blowing up the internet for the last few days and while I didn’t want to make my whole post today about it, because I felt that everything that’s been said already is all that can be said, I do want to point out that to anyone with ears who is willing to control their emotions it’s obvious Ben Affleck wasn’t fucking listening.
It’s also obvious that Bill Maher’s reputation isn’t that well known. The guy bashes religion week after week. He talks about Catholics and other Christians all of the time and to some extent he talks about the Jews. My issue with this is that when he does that no one ever gets up in arms. No one comes to complain or makes a big stink online about him bashing these other religions, but when he calls Islam out everyone loses their minds.
And it proves Maher’s point entirely. White, liberal America doesn’t want to talk about the problems in Islam. Even though there are valid complaints about all religions you can bring up and there are radical forms of most of the large religions, the one most exempt from criticism with them is the oddly always Islam.
Someone will probably call me a racist the same way they tried to call Maher racist, but despite my dislike of Maher I have to respect him because he’s one of the most no-bullshit commentators out there for politics, issues of race and religion.
People have to learn to give and take criticism about things like this. That’s why it’s scary that people in the United States want a theocracy. That number was widely reported when it came out and really it kind of makes me think less of my own country. I mean, sure that’s not a majority, thirty four percent, but we should be past wanting that sort of thing because it doesn’t work. Then you hear about the sixty-four percent of people in Pakistan and Egypt that support death as a punishment for leaving Islam and you wonder how anyone can defend something like that.
We have to stop worrying about the things that went on in the past between the West and the Near and Middle East. It seems that people are perfectly alright with bitching about the Catholic Church during the Crusades, but they shy away from this number—which is really a Crusade era type of thought.
I don’t always like Maher, but I feel the need to stand up with him because he seems to speak to what’s really going on more often than not, even if it’s in a blunt sometimes rude way. And with people unable to wake up and see what’s happening around them most of the time we need that.
October 6, 2014 § Leave a comment
Imagine that you lay yourself cold and naked on a metallic table. Next to this table is a smaller table with cup upon it filled with thin, fragile glass tubes and you voluntarily take one of those tubes and shove (see: not gentle) it up the hole in your penis (imagine that if you don’t have a penis for the sake of this because I’m almost thirty and I’m still not exactly sure where women pee from). Then you hit that tube with a hammer (and you penis with it) and you’re forced to piss that glass back out.
Rinse, wash, repeat for several hours.
Does that sound bad? Because that is how my experience listening to the audio book for the first of the Paladin of Shadows books, Ghost, has felt thus far.
And if that was too graphic, don’t read this book because it gets way worse for seemingly no reason other than to shock you and make you feel that these characters are evil.
I started reading it because the people over the podcast Read It and Weep were talking about it and I thought it would be sort of an endurance test. Now I’ve learned there are things far worse than Fifty Shades of Grey or the most abhorrent furry pandering fan fiction. I would read all of those things five times over to not have to hear it casually mentioned that some college girt had her nipples burned off with a blow torch before she was flayed or to not have to hear a strange, racist retelling of history where blacks didn’t have writing until they were enslaved by whites and Mexicans always drive vans.
The strange thing is that the author used to be somewhat reputable. He writes Republican space fantasy where capitalism saves the solar system and there’s some flashes of badly written sex scattered between the political grandstanding. But this book broke all the rules of writing at large and then just took a shit on so much else. We get characters being described while looking at their reflection. Women being noted as having nice hooters (in third person narrative), there’s multiple rape scenes that seem to serve as nonsensical torture porn of liberal women getting their “just deserts”. Oh, and at one point two characters just start to sing March of Cambreadth.
Oddly enough all of this has about a four star rating on any site that I can find. The characters seem to serve as either political representations of one thing or another. The main character’s only redeeming quality is his ability to kill scores of terrorists. And the book tries to sneak in a “see Bush was right about the weapons of mass destruction plot line”.
I can’t finish this whole thing, I’m quite sure I’ll rip my nuts off first. But I am determined for some reason to finish the first part of the book, it’s divided into thirds. I’ll write on it as I go through.
The plot thus far seems to be that Assad and a thinly veiled representation of bin Laden team up to bring college aged women from the US to Syria to be raped on live webcast to teach Americans a lesson. The women are always referred to as whores. The main character is a retired SEAL team member who is attending college and likes to stalk women that he dreams about raping. While stalking one girl she’s abducted by a van (that must be Mexicans because only they drive vans) and he follows the van to find out about the terrorist plot. He follows them to an airport and hops on a plane that’s bound for Syria as a stowaway to save the rest of the girls and kill bin Laden.
Never mind that an unauthorized jet full of people on the no fly list would have never taken off from an airport without catching an ass full of sidewinder missiles, the whole thing feels like it’s too crazy to be as popular as it is, but it’s totally well received by a group of people. It’s part of that Ayn Rand style fiction where you teach by writing about how your theories play themselves out.
Except that you write them in a totally biased way where the odds are stacked in your favor. Every capitalist, inventive type is the bastion of good and the rest of the world crumbles because they are tired of holding it up. In the case of Ghost the hero is a white middle aged man who loves Fox News (he’ll only call them to get the story because they’ll tell the truth) and a racist who uses words like raghead all the time and makes a point to talk about how the movie Roots was bullshit and then precedes to blame the Arabs solely for the slave trade as if no one else was there to benefit from it. He makes a point to say things like women want to fuck heroes and even goes on to demand a blow job from the first girl he saves (she tells him that she will blow him the next time she runs into him no matter where she spots him). And a character that refers to almost every woman in the book as a liberal bitch and makes a comment about how they’re going to turn these nearly raped girls into Republicans yet (because they’ve seen the horrors of Muslims).
The writing is made for a specific type of person to confirm what they already believe and what’s probably saddest is that I don’t see enough reviews pointing this out and condemning it. Even in the bad reviews.
This is running long, but there will be more to say once I finish this first third, I’m sure that this shit just gets worse.